Arizona · county
FIPS 04025county:04025ProxyAlso indexed as: Yavapai
A permanent, source-linked view of the county's 2016, 2020, and 2024 presidential history, turnout, election-administration context, and non-conclusive review signals.
Presidential results
| Year | Democratic | Republican | Other | Total | Winner / margin | Confidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 35,590Hillary Clinton · 31.10% | 71,330Donald Trump · 62.32% | 7,530 | 114,450 | Republican +35,740 (31.23%) | Proxy | Historical county presidential baseline rows |
| 2020 | 49,602Joe Biden · 34.62% | 91,527Donald Trump · 63.88% | 2,151 | 143,280 | Republican +41,925 (29.26%) | Proxy | Historical county presidential baseline rows |
| 2024 | 48,717Kamala Harris · 32.60% | 99,346Donald Trump · 66.48% | 1,365 | 149,428 | Republican +50,629 (33.88%) | Exact | Official signed statewide canvass county presidential and turnout rows |
“Other” includes all other loaded presidential candidates and write-ins. Margin is the absolute gap between the Democratic and Republican vote buckets, divided by all loaded presidential votes.
Participation
Arizona signed canvass Total Eligible Registration denominator
Official signed statewide canvass county presidential and turnout rowsAdministration context
No county-tagged vote-method rows are available.
Administration context
Equipment metadata is jurisdiction context only. It is not a vote or turnout row, does not prove or disprove an advisory signal, and does not guarantee every precinct or ballot mode used one identical setup.
| Vendor | System | Type / use | Paper record | Tabulation | Confidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unisyn | Unisyn OpenElect FVT + | Optical Scan · county_context | hand_marked_paper | Optical Scan | Proxy | Source |
Review context
These calculated indicators are prompts for checking source data, reporting grain, denominators, and local context. They are not evidence or findings of fraud, misconduct, or an incorrect election outcome.
County comparison difference crossed the review threshold: DEM -2.25% (z=0.63), REP 4.11% (z=-1.24).
This county's same-grain presidential-versus-comparison-contest difference is large or unusual relative to the other loaded counties. Candidate, turnout, and contest differences can explain the pattern; this is an advisory review flag, not a finding of misconduct.
Traceability
Geometry registry artifact: az-counties.geojson
Wikipedia county presidential tables with state election office source footnotes
Secondary normalized historical baseline used for context only. Individual rows carry the per-year page URL, and the tables cite Arizona Secretary of State canvass sources where available.Open sourceArizona Secretary of State
County rows transcribed from the official signed canvass PDF because the PDF host still presents a Cloudflare challenge to scripted download. Direct PDF source link remains visible for user verification.Open sourceVerified Voting
Verified Voting Verifier data is jurisdiction-level election-administration context. Most rows are counties, but some states report state-level rows and some county rows can summarize mixed tabulation, accessible-device, absentee, poll-book, or other configurations. Treat it as source-linked context, not proof every precinct in a county used one identical setup, and not a turnout or vote-result source.Open source