Civic Result MapsCounty election profile

Arkansas · county

Lonoke County

FIPS 05085county:05085Proxy

Also indexed as: Lonoke

A permanent, source-linked view of the county's 2016, 2020, and 2024 presidential history, turnout, election-administration context, and non-conclusive review signals.

Presidential results

2016–2024 county history

3 of 3 years available
YearDemocraticRepublicanOtherTotalWinner / marginConfidenceSource
20165,664Hillary Clinton · 20.90%19,958Donald Trump · 73.65%1,47827,100Republican +14,294 (52.75%)ProxyHistorical county presidential baseline rows
20206,686Joe Biden · 21.81%22,884Donald Trump · 74.63%1,09230,662Republican +16,198 (52.83%)ProxyHistorical county presidential baseline rows
20246,790Kamala Harris · 22.18%23,225Donald Trump · 75.85%60530,620Republican +16,435 (53.67%)ExactOfficial 2024 general election federal contest results

“Other” includes all other loaded presidential candidates and write-ins. Margin is the absolute gap between the Democratic and Republican vote buckets, divided by all loaded presidential votes.

Participation

2024 turnout context

Proxy
Ballots cast
30,731
Registered voters
50,732
Reported/calculated rate
60.58%
Reporting grain
jurisdiction

EAC-reported registered-voter denominator

EAC fallback turnout rows

Administration context

Vote methods

No county-tagged vote-method rows are available.

Administration context

Voting equipment

1 source-linked row

Equipment metadata is jurisdiction context only. It is not a vote or turnout row, does not prove or disprove an advisory signal, and does not guarantee every precinct or ballot mode used one identical setup.

VendorSystemType / usePaper recordTabulationConfidenceSource
ES&SES&S ExpressVote +Optical Scan · county_contextnot_recordedOptical ScanProxySource

Review context

Advisory indicators

1 matched indicator

These calculated indicators are prompts for checking source data, reporting grain, denominators, and local context. They are not evidence or findings of fraud, misconduct, or an incorrect election outcome.

average down ballot difference · severity 2.39

Average down-ballot difference

Average President-vs-down-ballot difference crossed threshold: DEM 2.87%, REP 0.40%.

Calculation detail

The average gap between presidential votes and same-party down-ballot votes is large enough to review. Split-ticket voting can explain some gap; this flag identifies areas needing supporting records.

Traceability

Sources and provenance

4 referenced sources
Canonical geography

Lonoke County · county:05085

Geometry registry artifact: ar-counties.geojson

Historical county presidential baseline rows

Historical county presidential baseline rows

Arkansas Secretary of State; secondary 2012 county table fallback

Mixed historical context package collected and configured for the generic historicalPresidentialCsv contract, but not enabled in native Arkansas staging until the shared native importer dispatch opts the Arkansas TotalResults parser into generic historical rows. 2016 and 2020 county baseline rows are official TotalResults API rows; 2012 rows are secondary contextual county rows because the official TotalResults 2012 archive endpoint was not script-readable.Open source
Official 2024 general election federal contest results

Official 2024 general election federal contest results

Arkansas Secretary of State

Official Arkansas Secretary of State TotalResults JSON package collected from the public results API. The statewide federal bucket contains county totals; county-scoped federal buckets expose subcounty reporting-unit IDs but not human-readable precinct names.Open source
EAC fallback turnout rows

EAC fallback turnout rows

U.S. Election Assistance Commission

National EAC fallback turnout rows. Prefer state election office denominator artifacts when available; keep fallback caveats visible in the app.Open source
equipment_context

Verified Voting Verifier AR 2024 equipment context

Verified Voting

Verified Voting Verifier data is jurisdiction-level election-administration context. Most rows are counties, but some states report state-level rows and some county rows can summarize mixed tabulation, accessible-device, absentee, poll-book, or other configurations. Treat it as source-linked context, not proof every precinct in a county used one identical setup, and not a turnout or vote-result source.Open source