- Voters
- 52
- Share
- 0.17%
Michigan · county
Tuscola County
FIPS 26157county:26157ProxyAlso indexed as: Tuscola
A permanent, source-linked view of the county's 2016, 2020, and 2024 presidential history, turnout, election-administration context, and non-conclusive review signals.
Presidential results
2016–2024 county history
| Year | Democratic | Republican | Other | Total | Winner / margin | Confidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 7,429Hillary Clinton · 28.65% | 17,102Donald Trump · 65.96% | 1,397 | 25,928 | Republican +9,673 (37.31%) | Proxy | Historical county presidential baseline rows |
| 2020 | 8,712Joe Biden · 29.55% | 20,297Donald Trump · 68.85% | 470 | 29,479 | Republican +11,585 (39.30%) | Proxy | Historical county presidential baseline rows |
| 2024 | 8,562Kamala Harris · 27.87% | 21,764Donald Trump · 70.85% | 391 | 30,717 | Republican +13,202 (42.98%) | Exact | Official county presidential results |
“Other” includes all other loaded presidential candidates and write-ins. Margin is the absolute gap between the Democratic and Republican vote buckets, divided by all loaded presidential votes.
Participation
2024 turnout context
- Ballots cast
- 30,890
- Registered voters
- 38,600
- Reported/calculated rate
- 80.03%
- Reporting grain
- local
novemberActiveRegisteredVoters
Official county turnout rowsAdministration context
Vote methods
- Voters
- 7,721
- Share
- 25.00%
- Voters
- 7,901
- Share
- 25.58%
- Voters
- —
- Share
- —
- Voters
- —
- Share
- —
- Voters
- 15,216
- Share
- 49.26%
- Voters
- 0
- Share
- 0.00%
Administration context
Voting equipment
Equipment metadata is jurisdiction context only. It is not a vote or turnout row, does not prove or disprove an advisory signal, and does not guarantee every precinct or ballot mode used one identical setup.
| Vendor | System | Type / use | Paper record | Tabulation | Confidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominion | Dominion ImageCast X BMD + | Optical Scan · county_context | hand_marked_paper | Optical Scan | Proxy | Source |
Review context
Advisory indicators
These calculated indicators are prompts for checking source data, reporting grain, denominators, and local context. They are not evidence or findings of fraud, misconduct, or an incorrect election outcome.
Average down-ballot difference
Average President-vs-down-ballot difference crossed threshold: DEM -0.70%, REP 3.98%.
Calculation detail
The average gap between presidential votes and same-party down-ballot votes is large enough to review. Split-ticket voting can explain some gap; this flag identifies areas needing supporting records.
Traceability
Sources and provenance
Tuscola County · county:26157
Geometry registry artifact: mi-counties.geojson
Historical county presidential baseline rows
Wikipedia county presidential tables with Michigan Secretary of State result-page citations where available
Secondary contextual baseline. MVIC and mielections.us official historical pages were not script-readable from this environment; replace with official Michigan SOS historical exports if collected.Open sourceOfficial county presidential results
Michigan Secretary of State
Official Michigan Voter Information Center election result export.Open sourceOfficial county turnout rows
Michigan Secretary of State
Official county turnout export.Open sourceVerified Voting Verifier MI 2024 equipment context
Verified Voting
Verified Voting Verifier data is jurisdiction-level election-administration context. Most rows are counties, but some states report state-level rows and some county rows can summarize mixed tabulation, accessible-device, absentee, poll-book, or other configurations. Treat it as source-linked context, not proof every precinct in a county used one identical setup, and not a turnout or vote-result source.Open sourceU.S. EAC Election Administration and Voting Survey
Source authority is recorded in the state package
See the state source package for provenance and caveats.Open source