Civic Result MapsCounty election profile

Montana · county

Silver Bow County

FIPS 30093county:30093Exact

Also indexed as: Silver Bow

A permanent, source-linked view of the county's 2016, 2020, and 2024 presidential history, turnout, election-administration context, and non-conclusive review signals.

Presidential results

2016–2024 county history

3 of 3 years available
YearDemocraticRepublicanOtherTotalWinner / marginConfidenceSource
20168,619Hillary Clinton · 52.43%6,376Donald Trump · 38.79%1,44416,439Democratic +2,243 (13.64%)ExactNormalized official 2016 and 2020 county presidential baseline CSV
202010,392Joe Biden · 55.70%7,745Donald Trump · 41.51%52118,658Democratic +2,647 (14.19%)ExactNormalized official 2016 and 2020 county presidential baseline CSV
20249,386Kamala Harris · 51.50%8,110Donald Trump · 44.50%73018,226Democratic +1,276 (7.00%)ExactOfficial 2024 general election precinct-by-precinct results workbook

“Other” includes all other loaded presidential candidates and write-ins. Margin is the absolute gap between the Democratic and Republican vote buckets, divided by all loaded presidential votes.

Participation

2024 turnout context

Proxy
Ballots cast
18,569
Registered voters
23,375
Reported/calculated rate
79.44%
Reporting grain
jurisdiction

EAC-reported registered-voter denominator

EAC fallback turnout rows

Administration context

Vote methods

No county-tagged vote-method rows are available.

Administration context

Voting equipment

1 source-linked row

Equipment metadata is jurisdiction context only. It is not a vote or turnout row, does not prove or disprove an advisory signal, and does not guarantee every precinct or ballot mode used one identical setup.

VendorSystemType / usePaper recordTabulationConfidenceSource
ES&SES&S ExpressVote +Optical Scan · county_contexthand_marked_paperOptical ScanProxySource

Review context

Advisory indicators

2 matched indicators

These calculated indicators are prompts for checking source data, reporting grain, denominators, and local context. They are not evidence or findings of fraud, misconduct, or an incorrect election outcome.

average down ballot difference · severity 9.83

Average down-ballot difference

Average President-vs-down-ballot difference crossed threshold: DEM -13.13%, REP 10.68%.

Calculation detail

The average gap between presidential votes and same-party down-ballot votes is large enough to review. Split-ticket voting can explain some gap; this flag identifies areas needing supporting records.

down ballot outliers · severity 9.83

Down-ballot outliers

Drop-off outlier count crossed threshold: DEM 7, REP 0, trigger 3.

Calculation detail

Enough local result rows have unusually large President-versus-down-ballot differences to pass the outlier-count threshold. This is an advisory review flag, not proof of tampering.

Traceability

Sources and provenance

4 referenced sources
Canonical geography

Silver Bow County · county:30093

Geometry registry artifact: mt-counties.geojson

Normalized official 2016 and 2020 county presidential baseline CSV

Normalized official 2016 and 2020 county presidential baseline CSV

Montana Secretary of State

County-level historical baseline rows resolve to Census county FIPS tags. Dem/Rep candidate totals are official workbook totals; other_votes exclude separate write-in canvass votes because the official export does not allocate them into county rows.Open source
Official 2024 general election precinct-by-precinct results workbook

Official 2024 general election precinct-by-precinct results workbook

Montana Secretary of State

Candidate-level precinct rows for President and U.S. Senate in one official workbook. Presidential write-ins are not included in this workbook, so the native metrics expose a 27-vote statewide certified gap against the canvass total.Open source
EAC fallback turnout rows

EAC fallback turnout rows

U.S. Election Assistance Commission

National EAC fallback turnout rows. Prefer state election office denominator artifacts when available; keep fallback caveats visible in the app.Open source
equipment_context

Verified Voting Verifier MT 2024 equipment context

Verified Voting

Verified Voting Verifier data is jurisdiction-level election-administration context. Most rows are counties, but some states report state-level rows and some county rows can summarize mixed tabulation, accessible-device, absentee, poll-book, or other configurations. Treat it as source-linked context, not proof every precinct in a county used one identical setup, and not a turnout or vote-result source.Open source