Civic Result MapsCounty election profile

New York · county

Allegany County

FIPS 36003county:36003Derived

Also indexed as: Allegany

A permanent, source-linked view of the county's 2016, 2020, and 2024 presidential history, turnout, election-administration context, and non-conclusive review signals.

Presidential results

2016–2024 county history

3 of 3 years available
YearDemocraticRepublicanOtherTotalWinner / marginConfidenceSource
20164,882Hillary Clinton · 25.87%12,525Donald Trump · 66.37%1,46518,872Republican +7,643 (40.50%)ExactHistorical county presidential baseline rows
20206,048Joe Biden · 29.20%14,135Donald Trump · 68.25%52820,711Republican +8,087 (39.05%)ExactHistorical county presidential baseline rows
20245,802Kamala Harris · 28.18%14,425Donald Trump · 70.07%36120,588Republican +8,623 (41.88%)DerivedOfficial 2024 general election county presidential results

“Other” includes all other loaded presidential candidates and write-ins. Margin is the absolute gap between the Democratic and Republican vote buckets, divided by all loaded presidential votes.

Participation

2024 turnout context

Proxy
Ballots cast
20,658
Registered voters
28,232
Reported/calculated rate
73.17%
Reporting grain
jurisdiction

EAC-reported registered-voter denominator

EAC fallback turnout rows

Administration context

Vote methods

No county-tagged vote-method rows are available.

Administration context

Voting equipment

1 source-linked row

Equipment metadata is jurisdiction context only. It is not a vote or turnout row, does not prove or disprove an advisory signal, and does not guarantee every precinct or ballot mode used one identical setup.

VendorSystemType / usePaper recordTabulationConfidenceSource
Hart InterCivicHart InterCivic Verity Touch Writer +Optical Scan · county_contexthand_marked_paperOptical ScanProxySource

Review context

Advisory indicators

2 matched indicators

These calculated indicators are prompts for checking source data, reporting grain, denominators, and local context. They are not evidence or findings of fraud, misconduct, or an incorrect election outcome.

average down ballot difference · severity 4.26

Average down-ballot difference

Average President-vs-down-ballot difference crossed threshold: DEM -1.95%, REP 3.93%.

Calculation detail

The average gap between presidential votes and same-party down-ballot votes is large enough to review. Split-ticket voting can explain some gap; this flag identifies areas needing supporting records.

vote share pattern · severity 4.26

Vote-share pattern

Vote-share correlation crossed threshold: Trump r=0.171, Harris r=0.803.

Calculation detail

Bigger local reporting-unit vote totals move with candidate vote share strongly enough to pass the native review threshold. This is an advisory review flag, not proof of tampering.

Traceability

Sources and provenance

4 referenced sources
Canonical geography

Allegany County · county:36003

Geometry registry artifact: ny-counties.geojson

Historical county presidential baseline rows

Historical county presidential baseline rows

New York State Board of Elections

Official county historical presidential baselines used for context only. 2012 and 2016 other-vote totals include the separate NYSBOE official presidential write-in final total pages; 2020 uses the presidential table write-in column.Open source
Official 2024 general election county presidential results

Official 2024 general election county presidential results

New York State Board of Elections

Normalized county CSV extracted from official PDF text and cross-checked against the statewide candidate totals shown on the NYSBOE archive contest/document page.Open source
EAC fallback turnout rows

EAC fallback turnout rows

U.S. Election Assistance Commission

National EAC fallback turnout rows. Prefer state election office denominator artifacts when available; keep fallback caveats visible in the app.Open source
equipment_context

Verified Voting Verifier NY 2024 equipment context

Verified Voting

Verified Voting Verifier data is jurisdiction-level election-administration context. Most rows are counties, but some states report state-level rows and some county rows can summarize mixed tabulation, accessible-device, absentee, poll-book, or other configurations. Treat it as source-linked context, not proof every precinct in a county used one identical setup, and not a turnout or vote-result source.Open source