Civic Result MapsCounty election profile

Washington · county

Okanogan County

FIPS 53047county:53047Proxy

Also indexed as: Okanogan

A permanent, source-linked view of the county's 2016, 2020, and 2024 presidential history, turnout, election-administration context, and non-conclusive review signals.

Presidential results

2016–2024 county history

3 of 3 years available
YearDemocraticRepublicanOtherTotalWinner / marginConfidenceSource
20166,298Hillary Clinton · 36.85%9,610Donald Trump · 56.23%1,18317,091Republican +3,312 (19.38%)ProxyOfficial Washington 2016 and 2020 county presidential historical baseline rows
20208,900Joe Biden · 41.82%11,840Donald Trump · 55.63%54221,282Republican +2,940 (13.81%)ProxyOfficial Washington 2016 and 2020 county presidential historical baseline rows
20248,466Kamala Harris · 40.84%11,555Donald Trump · 55.74%71120,732Republican +3,089 (14.90%)ExactOfficial county presidential results

“Other” includes all other loaded presidential candidates and write-ins. Margin is the absolute gap between the Democratic and Republican vote buckets, divided by all loaded presidential votes.

Participation

2024 turnout context

Proxy
Ballots cast
20,832
Registered voters
28,949
Reported/calculated rate
71.96%
Reporting grain
jurisdiction

EAC-reported registered-voter denominator

EAC fallback county turnout rows

Administration context

Vote methods

No county-tagged vote-method rows are available.

Administration context

Voting equipment

1 source-linked row

Equipment metadata is jurisdiction context only. It is not a vote or turnout row, does not prove or disprove an advisory signal, and does not guarantee every precinct or ballot mode used one identical setup.

VendorSystemType / usePaper recordTabulationConfidenceSource
Hart InterCivicHart InterCivic Verity Touch Writer +Optical Scan · county_contexthand_marked_paperOptical ScanProxySource

Review context

Advisory indicators

2 matched indicators

These calculated indicators are prompts for checking source data, reporting grain, denominators, and local context. They are not evidence or findings of fraud, misconduct, or an incorrect election outcome.

average down ballot difference · severity 3.14

Average down-ballot difference

Average President-vs-down-ballot difference crossed threshold: DEM -2.95%, REP 2.59%.

Calculation detail

The average gap between presidential votes and same-party down-ballot votes is large enough to review. Split-ticket voting can explain some gap; this flag identifies areas needing supporting records.

vote share pattern · severity 3.14

Vote-share pattern

Vote-share correlation crossed threshold: Trump r=0.582, Harris r=0.568.

Calculation detail

Bigger local reporting-unit vote totals move with candidate vote share strongly enough to pass the native review threshold. This is an advisory review flag, not proof of tampering.

Traceability

Sources and provenance

4 referenced sources
Canonical geography

Okanogan County · county:53047

Geometry registry artifact: wa-counties.geojson

Official Washington 2016 and 2020 county presidential historical baseline rows

Official Washington 2016 and 2020 county presidential historical baseline rows

Washington Secretary of State

Official county-level 2016 and 2020 presidential baseline rows for 39 Washington counties. Rows are contextual historical baselines used for county:<GEOID> flip joins; 2012 remains uncollected.Open source
Official county presidential results

Official county presidential results

Washington Secretary of State

Official Washington Secretary of State county CSV; presidential totals reconcile to the official all-state CSV.Open source
EAC fallback county turnout rows

EAC fallback county turnout rows

U.S. Election Assistance Commission

National EAC fallback turnout rows. Prefer Washington Secretary of State turnout-denominator artifacts if equal or finer official detail is later sourced.Open source
equipment_context

Verified Voting Verifier WA 2024 equipment context

Verified Voting

Verified Voting Verifier data is jurisdiction-level election-administration context. Most rows are counties, but some states report state-level rows and some county rows can summarize mixed tabulation, accessible-device, absentee, poll-book, or other configurations. Treat it as source-linked context, not proof every precinct in a county used one identical setup, and not a turnout or vote-result source.Open source